Home / Issues / Privacy and Surveillance / Privacy and Government

What's at Stake

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Our Position

Test – The BCCLA argues that prisons have no authority to impose prolonged, indefinite lockdowns and restrictive movement routines. We also argue these procedures violate many Charter rights and constitute solitary confinement under the Mandela Rules. International bodies have concluded that long-term solitary confinement amounts to torture.


Lockdowns and restrictive movement routines have a disproportionate impact on Indigenous and racialized people as well people with mental disabilities. These restrictions on liberty often affect Indigenous peoples’ access to Elders and ceremonies.

RELATED CAMPAIGNS

Digital Privacy Rights for Youth

More and more of our lives involve electronic devices. When...

Digital Privacy Rights for Youth

More and more of our lives involve electronic devices. When...

Secret Spy Hearings

In 2014 the BCCLA fought back against illegal spying by...

Secret Spy Hearings

In 2014 the BCCLA fought back against illegal spying by...
POLICY SUBMISSIONS

Where we address how laws or policies may infringe on civil liberties, and provide recommendations to protect fundamental rights and freedoms. 

LEGAL Cases

Where we address how laws or policies may infringe on civil liberties, and provide recommendations to protect fundamental rights and freedoms. 

CIVIL LIBERTIES CAN’T PROTECT THEMSELVES