These pages list the legal documents for the cases.
The question raised by this appeal was whether government entities have the right to control the content of the expression that took place on the side of buses. The BCCLA argued that refusing to allow the appellants to advertise on … Read More
The question raised by this argument was whether government entities have the right to control the content of the expression that took place on the side of buses. The BCCLA argued that refusing to allow the appellants to advertise on … Read More
The BCCLA restricts its submissions to two questions that arise as a matter of the interpretation of the Police Act, R.S.B.C. 1996 c. 367. The first question concerns the participatory rights of complainants in a hearing called into the disciplinary … Read More
The Plaintiffs in this action challenge decisions taken by the Board of Directors of the Defendants, The Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority (TransLink) and British Columbia Transit (BC Transit), which caused the Defendants not to accept certain advertisements (the “Ads”) which … Read More
Both Defendants admit that they refused to permit the Ads, but each says that it is not a government to which the Charter applies, there was no infringement of section 2(b) of the Charter, in any event, and, if there … Read More
At the heart of this case is the balance that must be struck between the rights of a public servant to free political and religious expression in the public forum on the one hand, and the rights of strudents to … Read More
This case is one of great importance in the long and continuing struggle to ensure that the Rule of Law runs inside Canadian prisons. The case is about the crucial role of judicial intervention, involving both the jurisdiction of the … Read More
BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION APPLICATION FOR STANDING AND FUNDING Memorandum of Argument 1. The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (“BCCLA”) has a substantial and direct interest in the subject matter of these proceedings and respectfully requests full standing at … Read More
The case at bar is one of competing rights and interests. Mr. Kempling has an interest in speaking his mind on the issue of homosexuality and his religious views. This interest is constitutionally protected is ss. 2(a) and (b), and … Read More
This work by BC Civil Liberties Association is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License.